Musk Pushed Back Against Tesla Employees’ Autopilot Concerns: Report

2016 Tesla Model S

Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s drive to develop and market new driving technology is nicely recognized, but former employees say he brushed aside their concerns about the security of the company’s Autopilot system.

Several employees, like a former Autopilot engineer, told CNN Funds that their concerns fell on deaf ears, as Musk usually reverted back to a “bigger picture” position on safety.

The automaker’s semi-autonomous driving system came under scrutiny in the wake of a fatal May crash. Musk claims that although the Autopilot didn’t recognize a transport truck in that case, the technique tends to make roads safer. He’s pledged to do far more to educate owners on how to effectively use Autopilot, but has no plans to stop providing the technique.

Musk told the Wall Street Journal “we knew we had a technique that on balance would save lives.”

Speaking to CNNMoney, ex-Autopilot engineer Eric Meadows claims he was pulled more than by police in 2015 although testing Autopilot on a Los Angeles highway, a few months just before the system’s release. The Tesla had difficulty handling turns, and the police suspected him of becoming intoxicated.

Meadows was later fired for overall performance motives, but he claims his worries about Autopilot’s security — specifically the possibility that owners would “push the limits” of the technologies — grew over time.

“The last two months I was scared an individual was going to die,” he said.

The report mentions a former Tesla executive who worked closely with Musk, and claims the CEO was regularly at loggerheads with “overly cautious” employees. Tesla’s self-parking feature went ahead as planned, another source claims, despite worries that sensors wouldn’t function effectively if the vehicle was close to the edge of a steep slope. Again, the greater great of preventing driveway deaths overruled these concerns.

The employee mix at Tesla falls into two categories — younger, data-driven personnel and seasoned automotive sector varieties. The report cites several sources who claim that information is the guiding element in Tesla’s decisions, meaning slight risk is allowed if it means a greater possible for general safety.

Even though this bothers some engineers and customer safety groups, even the agency investigating the Might crash sides with Musk’s views on security. Recently, National Highway Targeted traffic Security Administration administrator Mark Rosekind mentioned the sector “cannot wait for perfect” when it comes to advertising and marketing potentially life-saving autonomous technology.

[Image: Tesla Motors]

Vehicle Critiques – The Truth About Cars

Lawsuits Against Volkswagen Using Mob-inspired Law to Takedown Automaker


Complaints filed against Volkswagen of America are using the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act to allege that the automaker knowingly committed fraud across state lines, court documents show.

The law, which was produced in the 1970s to take down the U.S. mafia, could have severe ramifications for Volkswagen, who admitted that its cars illegally polluted.

Accusing the automaker of violating RICO Act would mean that lawsuits against the automaker could be much more lucrative and amplify damage to the automaker.

According to Rick Wynkoop, an automotive lawyer in Denver, plaintiffs suing Volkswagen for violating RICO statutes have a greater burden of pleading than an ordinary case. The claims need to be especially targeted, such as fraud.

In a Southern California case filed against Volkswagen, the plaintiffs accused the automaker of some significant mob shiz:

VW AG directed VW America to engage in fraudulent activities that affected interstate commerce, which included acquiring fraudulent certificates of conformity from the EPA and the design and style, manufacture, testing, sale and distribution of the Defective Cars to consumers all more than the United States. VW AG used VW America to manufacture and sell the Defective Automobiles all through the United States with defeat devices that purposefully circumvented federal and state emissions laws, and VW America operated its largest emissions testing center in California. …


In devising and executing the illegal scheme, the (Volkswagen) devised and knowingly carried out a material scheme and/or artifice to defraud (VW owners) or to acquire cash from (VW owners) by signifies of materially false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, promises, or omissions of material information. For the purpose of executing the illegal scheme, the (Volkswagen) committed these racketeering acts, which number in the thousands, intentionally and knowingly with the distinct intent to advance the illegal scheme.

So, essentially, Volkswagen and the mob are the exact same factor, according to court documents.

The RICO Act has been utilised increasingly to take down corporations in the previous few years, so the charges are not completely unfounded. The U.S. Division of Justice lately mentioned worldwide soccer officials from FIFA violated RICO laws by utilizing influence and power to extort bribes from other countries.

(In each circumstances, the Justice Department and plaintiffs suing Volkswagen have the hard activity of proving some of our laws are applicable overseas, one thing that the U.S. Supreme Court hasn’t thought so extremely of.)

The charges against VW aren’t completely unfounded. In September, the Justice Department charged Basic Motors with wire fraud in connection with its defective ignition switches that resulted in 124 deaths. Beneath RICO statues, wire and mail fraud would need to be proved by the plaintiffs — probably by emails identified on seized computers? — with two incidents over a ten-year period to constitute a “pattern.”

But if confirmed, Wyknoop points out, the RICO allegations could imply Volkswagen would spend significantly a lot more to the plaintiffs.

“It’s a tougher claim to prove, but RICO supplies for treble damages and lawyer charges. It is a powerful tool to go against organizations that break the law. Actually hasn’t changed significantly since they went following mob with it back in the ’70s,” he said.

The Truth About Vehicles » Automobile Evaluations