Bosch Sought Legal Protection from Volkswagen More than ‘Defeat Device’ Use: Lawyers


(Reuters) – Auto supplier Robert Bosch GmbH concealed the use of Volkswagen AG’s secret “defeat device” software program that it helped style and demanded in 2008 that the German automaker offer legal protection in its use, lawyers for American owners alleged in a court filing.

The filing on Friday in U.S. District Court in San Francisco expands on claims plaintiffs lawyers produced in August, when they alleged Bosch was a “knowing and active participant” in Volkswagen’s decade-extended scheme to evade U.S. anti-pollution laws. Bosch lawyers stated last month those claims were “wild and unfounded.”

VW has admitted that it installed improper computer software that deactivated pollution controls on more than 11 million diesel cars sold worldwide and has agreed to devote as considerably as $ 16.five billion in the United States to address emissions concerns, which includes compensating owners of 475,000 2.-liter diesel cars.

The new filing delivers the most detailed list of claims against Bosch. Lawyers are also looking for redress for owners from Bosch.

The new court filing involves portions of the allegations that have been initially redacted in August by the plaintiffs below court rules and says Bosch “did not disclose its information of the illegal defeat device in any … communications with U.S. regulators.”

The filing said Bosch demanded in 2008 that Volkswagen indemnify it more than the use of the software developed by the German auto supplier, citing a June 2008 email from Bosch to VW.

The e mail demanded “Volkswagen indemnify Bosch for any legal exposure arising from operate on the defeat device,” the lawsuit said.

The lawyers stated VW apparently refused to agree to Bosch’s request but mentioned they are still investigating.

A U.S. Bosch spokeswoman and Volkswagen did not respond to a request for comment late Tuesday.

The filing also accuses Bosch Chief Executive Officer Volkmar Denner of realizing about the use of the defeat device. It alleges that in May 2014 Denner took part in a meeting with former VW CEO Martin Winterkorn that shows each “were aware of the illegal use of the defeat devices at least by Could 2014.”

Winterkorn resigned in September 2015.

Bosch makes an engine handle unit utilised by several leading automakers which includes VW. It supplied application and components to VW but has mentioned duty for how software is utilised to regulate exhaust emissions or fuel consumption lies with carmakers.

Bosch has not been charged with any wrongdoing. German prosecutors stated in December that they have been investigating no matter whether employees at the Stuttgart-primarily based organization have been involved in the rigging of emissions tests by VW.

Denner stated in January he had ordered an internal investigation and was cooperating with authorities. In April, Bosch said it had set aside 650 million euros for possible legal charges, including for a continuing investigation into the company’s role in Volkswagen’s emissions scandal.

In June, Deputy U.S. Lawyer Common Sally Yates said the VW investigation is looking at “multiple businesses and multiple people.” (Reporting by David Shepardson Editing by Cynthia Osterman)

Car Testimonials – The Truth About Vehicles

The Newest Model S Could be Faster Than Tesla Admits

Tesla Model S

Click “pause” on that Model S vs. supercar/fighter jet video, Tesla aficionados.

The newest Model S P90D will outrun last year’s leading-shelf Tesla whilst in Ludicrous mode, according to acceleration tests published by Drag Occasions.

The -to-60 mph run was created in a fresh-off-the-line P90D by Brooks Weisblat. The Model S underwent a styling and content update earlier this year, although Tesla claims its power hasn’t changed. Weisblat’s Vbox sport performance meter says otherwise.

Tesla rates the P90D at 532 horsepower when equipped with Ludicrous mode, excellent for a two.8-second -60 run. On a non-ready roadway, Weisblat’s stock Model S returned a time of 2.65 seconds.

No stranger to fast launches, Weisblat was reportedly extremely surprised by the Tesla’s puissance. Just to make sure the acceleration figure wasn’t a weird fluke, he performed the run again. Once more, 2.65 seconds.

The automaker isn’t saying why the newest P90D seems to be faster than prior models. Speculation abounds, however, with the answer ranging from subtly improved aerodynamics to a secretly improved battery pack.

Watch the extremely short run to 60 mph below:

[Image: Tesla Motors]

Auto Evaluations – The Truth About Cars

Is Musk Biting Off More Than He Can Chew With SolarCity Proposal?


It was a small terrifying watching the question-and-answer session near the finish of Tesla’s livestreamed annual shareholder’s meeting, and it wasn’t just the lady asking about goji berries.

All of the speakers — effectively, the majority of them — seemed to possess a stratospheric level of admiration for Tesla CEO Elon Musk. Like religious (or political) disciples, the trust they placed in the man’s brilliance and selection-producing skills seemed limitless.

Properly, following this week’s announcement that Tesla is supplying to purchase SolarCity — a solar energy provider co-founded and chaired by Musk — cracks are forming in his circle of supporters, particularly in the financial realm.

The proposed share-for-share deal would be worth somewhere in the region of $ two.eight billion. Each and every business is embarking on its largest project to date: Tesla is readying its California assembly plant and battery-producing Gigafactory for subsequent year’s Model three, although SolarCity is attempting to get its enormous Buffalo, New York solar panel factory off the ground.

The prospective for a monetary cushion lifted SolarCity’s stock yesterday, but Tesla’s share rates made like Gerald Ford exiting an airplane.

When trading opened yesterday, Tesla shares have been all of a sudden twenty bucks decrease than they were at four p.m. the day prior to ($ 199.31, down from $ 219.61). At final read, values had eroded additional, to $ 194.32. Not a Volkswagen-level drop, but a negative reaction to the SolarCity proposal nonetheless.

These days, Morgan Stanley’s Adam Jonas, generally an enthusiastic believer in Tesla’s business abilities, lowered his recommendation of the stock, as effectively as his 12-month target price tag. No longer predicting a $ 333 per share worth, Jonas now sees the number $ 243.

Writing to consumers, he stated, “we believe numerous of the positive aspects could have been accomplished by way of arm’s length/strategic partnership and without the risks inherent in exposing Tesla shareholders to the monetary and capital markets risks faced by (SolarCity).”

Over at MarketWatch, investing columnist Philip Van Doorn warned investors not to expect to make much income in the near term. In his column, he quoted David Bechtel, a principal at Barrow Funds, who named a achievable merger between the two businesses “downright frightening.”

Financier Jim Chanos referred to as it a “shameful example of corporate governance at its worst,” adding that neither business is financially strong adequate to deal with a merger.

Some critics worry that a deal would result in Tesla to take its eye off the ball (which means the Model 3), risking the company’s fortunes and future. Musk claims the merger makes sense, as both companies are pursuing diverse ends of the exact same marketplace. He’s also said a merger wouldn’t impact Tesla’s money flow.

Regardless of some investor panic over Musk’s actions, not all Tesla shareholders are obtaining cold feet. Reuters quoted Joe Dennison, portfolio manager at Zevenbergen Capital Investments (a holder of 600,000 shares), who referred to as the strategy “a organic evolution of (Tesla’s) mission to transform transportation into a sustainable company.”

[Sources: Bloomberg, MarketWatch, Reuters, BBC]

Vehicle Critiques – The Truth About Cars

Ghost in the Machine: Man Sues More than Possessed Tesla Model X

Tesla Model X, Image: Tesla Motors

Negative PR from customers annoyed by their difficulty-plagued Tesla Model X SUVs continues to hammer the electric automaker.

A lawsuit filed against Tesla by a California man is the most current bit of poor news (and press) for the firm. According to Barrett Lyon, the bizarre electrical gremlins operating loose in his Model X turned his automobile into a static driveway decoration.

It is no wonder Tesla CEO Elon Musk sleeps at the office and keeps his desk at the end of the production line.

The issues reported by Lyon and the initial delay in obtaining the Model X to customers are a big purpose why Musk wants to manufacture his own parts.

Lyon, who already owns a Tesla Roadster and a Model S, paid $ 162,000 for the automobile. Soon soon after, strange factors started to happen.

“The doors do some weird, wicked things,” Lyon told Courthouse News. “If you get in and slide sideways and accidentally tap the brake, the driver’s side door slams shut on your leg. That is not a quite good factor to have come about to you.”

The automatic doors also slammed shut on his wife, Lyon claimed, and opened unexpectedly, causing damage to the doors and products inside his garage. In parking lots, the doors open into other autos, he claimed.

The gripes outlined in the lawsuit do not finish there. According to Lyon, the autonomous Autopilot feature swerves the vehicle into other lanes for the duration of rainstorms, the self-parking feature doesn’t operate 90 % of the time, and the touchscreen freezes for no reason.

Allegedly, Tesla Motors was unable to fix the car, so Lyon filed suit to get his acquire quantity and registration fee back. He’s also seeking damages for breach of warranty and California Lemon Law violations.

The Model X now sits idle in his driveway.

“You acquire a vehicle like that, you expect it to perform,” Lyon said. “It’s grow to be clear to me that the automobile wasn’t ready for buyers. The service center is completely unprepared for the type of troubles they’re obtaining.”

In April, Tesla recalled 2,700 Model X vehicles to stop rear seatback failures. Other situations of issues with the model’s signature “falcon wing” doors have been reported, as effectively as complaints about loose weatherstripping and frayed carpets.

[Source: Courthouse News Service] [Image: Tesla Motors]

Auto Critiques – The Truth About Vehicles

BMW Facing Lawsuit More than i3 REx Power Loss

2015 BMW i3 Range Extender, Image: © 2015 Alex L. Dykes/The Truth About Cars

Owners of BMW i3s equipped with optional range extenders — read: two-cylinder engine that generates electrical energy — are suing the automaker for an problem that could leave these drivers going slow in the rapidly lane.

According to Green Automobile Reports, the BMW i3 REx will drop down to 45 miles per hour under specific circumstances, which some owners believe is a safety situation.

The class-action lawsuit alleges the modest range extender is not strong enough keep up with motivational demand at highway speeds when the battery is practically depleted. Engine and battery management software steps in and reduces the BMW i3’s speed to 45 mph so that battery charge can catch up with demand.

“The BMW i3 Variety Extender function is a dangerous instrumentality to the owners of the cars and to other motorists on the road,” mentioned Jonathan Michaels of MLG Automotive Law, the firm handling the class-action suit. “Having a sudden and unexpected loss of energy in a motor car can outcome in a catastrophic circumstance for all those on the road. These automobiles are dangerous and should not be driven.”

Green Vehicle Reports notes three of its editors have seasoned the issue in addition to its many owners.

The outlet spoke with electric-auto advocate Tom Moloughney, who is also a BMW i3 owner. He stated the issue mainly comes down to a lack of information of how the variety extender works, and refrained from blaming the i3 for a quirk that does not impact any other vehicle on sale these days.

“The largest issue is the lack of details on how the REx works at the dealership level. I consider if people understood how the variety-extender method works, then there would be fewer troubles,” Moloughney stated.

A representative for BMW said the business cannot comment on pending litigation.

The BMW i3 REx stickers, with no possibilities, for $ 47,245, including destination.

[Image: © 2015 Alex L. Dykes/The Truth About Cars]

Vehicle Testimonials – The Truth About Vehicles

Former Volkswagen Employee Claims Unlawful Firing More than Information Deletions

Data, Image: rh2ox/Flickr

A former employee, who was fired after news of Volkswagen’s diesel emissions scandal broke, is claiming in a lawsuit that he was let go from the automaker after noticing data connected to the scandal was getting deleted, several German language outlets are reporting (via Automotive News).

The lawsuit, filed by a former employee of Volkswagen Group of America, is the initial possible evidence produced public so far of a good, old fashioned cover up on this side of the Atlantic.

The employee, who worked at VWGoA’s information center in Michigan, started flagging information deletions created by a co-worker that started on September 18, 2015, the identical day the scandal broke, the suit claims. According to reports, the deletions happened right after a U.S. Department of Justice order to stop all “routine” information deletions at VWGoA.

The plaintiff is searching for damages in the suit. He’s protected from retaliation beneath Michigan’s whistleblower laws.

[Image: r2hox/Flickr (CC BY-SA two.)]

The Truth About Automobiles » Vehicle Evaluations

Who Desires To Lease A Chevy Cruze For Significantly less Than A Gym Membership?


Leasehackr has a screaming deal on a 2016 Chevrolet Cruze Restricted (the old physique style) 1LT Automatic if:

1) You can sell it for much more than $ 13,000 soon after two years
2) You are had been a Costco Auto member prior to Sept. 30
3) You can get $ 1,800 off of MSRP, or thereabouts
4) Max incentives
five) You are a existing lessee of another automaker
six) You don’t thoughts driving a Chevrolet Cruze Restricted 1LT Automatic for two years.

If you ticked every 1 of those boxes, congratulations! You can lease a 2016 Chevrolet Cruze for $ 40 or less*** per month for 24 months.

The math breaks down as such, according to Leasehackr:


  • GM Financial Lease Cash — $ 1,700
  • Incremental Bonus Client Money — $ 1,075 (not obtainable in some locations, including Denver)
  • Chevrolet Bonus Cash — $ 1,000
  • GM Competitive Lessee Conquest Cash — $ 1,500

Add all these up, and knock it off the asking price tag of $ 21,070 and you’re roughly looking at $ 15,795.

Now, ask the Chevy dealer to quite, fairly please knock $ 1,800 off the price of an outgoing Cruze model and you’re sitting at $ 13,995 following it’s all over.

According to Leasehackr, GM Financial estimates that your 2016 Chevrolet Cruze will be worth roughly $ 13,280 soon after two years with 10,000 each year, which tends to make the total depreciation expense $ 715 — or about $ 29 a month. Throw in a month-to-month finance charge of about $ 11, and that is a Chevy Cruze for $ 40 a month.

Exactly where does the Costco membership come in?

If you have been a Costco Auto member ahead of Sept. 30, you can get a $ 700 present card back from Costco for leasing the Cruze. That’s a lot of mayo.

*** You already personal a Chevrolet Volt, you say? Greater news! You can get $ 2,500 Volt Loyalty cash off that Cruze lease, which implies you just scored a 24-month lease for free — or even made cash.

You’re welcome,

Your TTAC Monetary* Adviser Group
“Just Cut Us The Verify Already”

* 1. The details supplied on this TTAC website has been compiled for your convenience. TTAC makes no warranties about the accuracy or completeness of any data contained on this web site.

  1. TTAC, including its directors, affiliates, officers, workers, agents, contractors, successors and assigns, will not accept any liability for any loss, harm or other injury resulting from its use.
  1. Links to other websites are provided for your convenience and TTAC is not responsible for the details contained on those sites. The provision of a hyperlink to one more internet site does not constitute an endorsement or approval of that internet site, or any items or services offered on that web site, by TTAC. TTAC will not accept any liability for the use of those links to connect to internet sites that are not under our manage.
  1. TTAC, its directors, affiliates, officers, employees, agents, contractors, successors and assigns do not accept any liability:
    (a) for any investment choices made on the basis of this info. This internet site does not constitute economic suggestions and should not be taken as such. TTAC urges you to get professional advice before proceeding with any investment since we’re stupid.
    (b) for any damages or losses whatsoever, arising out of, or in any way related to, the use of this site and any other internet site linked to this site.
  1. The limitation on liability contained in paragraph four applies to direct, indirect, consequential, unique, punitive or other damages that you or other people may endure, as nicely as damages for loss of profit, business interruption or the loss of data or details.
  1. Nothing at all in this web site constitutes or is intended to constitute an offer of, or an invitation to obtain or subscribe for, securities. TTAC holds the copyright to this internet site. TTAC grants you a restricted license to download this website for individual use only. You are not permitted to reproduce or alter this site, or any copy of it, for any other objective with out the prior express written consent of TTAC.
  1. TTAC regards your privacy as crucial and will take all affordable methods to make sure that if you have subscribed to receive notification of web site updates your e mail address will stay confidential.
  1. TTAC reserves the right to make alterations, modifications, additions, deletions and corrections to the internet site, at any time and without notice.

Financial Disclaimer

TTAC does not accept any liability for any investment decisions produced on the basis of this details. This site does not constitute economic advice and need to not be taken as such. TTAC urges you to obtain specialist suggestions ahead of proceeding with any investment.

External Link Disclaimer

Any hyperlinks have been supplied for your convenience. Internet sites which you are transferred to are not controlled by TTAC and TTAC is not responsible, and does not accept any liability, for the details contained on these web sites. The provision of a link does not constitute an endorsement or approval of that website or any products or services on that website.

We wouldn’t know what to do with real funds anyway.

The Truth About Automobiles » Auto Reviews

We’ll Get The Chinese-made 2016 Buick Envision Sooner Than We Expected

2016 Buick Envision Front 3/4

Buick announced Friday that it will bring from China the Buick Envision to sell in the U.S. subsequent summer time, two years following that car was introduced overseas, and that it will be the first Chinese-made car from a domestic manufacturer.

Automotive News reported that the modest crossover would go on sale sometime around August, earlier than expected from initial reports last month.

When it goes on sale, the Envision will be powered by a two-liter turbocharged 4 that makes 252 horsepower and will only be supplied in all-wheel drive to start. The model will be bookended by the subcompact-sized Encore and complete-size Enclave and fill a substantial require for the premium automaker. 

The Envision is constructed on Common Motors’ replacement for its Theta platform that will at some point underpin the new Chevrolet Equinox and GMC Terrain.

The new crossover will most likely start near $ 35,000 to fill the void amongst the Encore, which starts at around $ 25,000, and the Enclave, which begins close to $ 40,000.

The Envision will be roughly 1 inch longer than the Audi Q5 at 183.7 inches and significantly less than 1 inch shorter than the Acura RDX. Each premium crossovers commence at more than $ 35,000 — the RDX is priced closer to $ 36,000 and the Q5 starts more than $ 40,000.

The Envision will be assembled in GM’s Shandong facility.

The Truth About Automobiles » Auto Testimonials

Merkel: ‘VW is Functioning On This With All of Its Power’ – Which includes Asking Workers to Roll More than

2015 Volkswagen Golf TDI white

On her weekly podcast, German Prime Minister Angela Merkel mentioned Volkswagen’s scandal hasn’t harmed the German automobile industry’s image, but that the automaker would need to conduct its investigation with transparency to restore faith in the country’s industry.

“A lot will depend on how Volkswagen offers with the issue,” Merkel said, according to Reuters.

Separately, sources told German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung (by means of Reuters) that the automaker, below stress from investigators, is providing amnesty to personnel who reveal what they knew about its cheating devices. Amnesty won’t apply to prime-level managers, according to the report.

Rank-and-file workers would be capable to preserve their jobs and escape damage claims if they tell investigators what they know about the cheating device that has expense the automaker billions so far.

Volkswagen hired U.S. law firm Jones Day to conduct its internal investigation. So far, several executives have been suspended, according to reports including Volkswagen’s quality control chief Frank Tuch was suspended for “incriminating letters.”

Among ten and 30 engineers may have been responsible for the illegal software program developed to cheat emissions controls.

Volkswagen hasn’t said when its investigation would be total.

The Truth About Automobiles » Automobile Reviews

Matthias Müller Will Take More than At Volkswagen, Vahland Becomes Horn’s Boss


Generating official Friday what we’ve heard for a although (Der Tagesspiegel reported on Monday), Porsche CEO Matthias Müller will take the reigns at Volkswagen.

Müller replaces Martin Winterkorn, who resigned soon after the Environmental Protection Agency notified Volkswagen that 482,000 automobiles in the U.S. used an illegal “defeat device” to cheat emissions.

In a statement Müller said that restoring trust in the automaker would be his initial priority:

My most urgent job is to win back trust for the Volkswagen Group – by leaving no stone unturned and with maximum transparency, as effectively as drawing the right conclusions from the present circumstance.

Prior to becoming CEO at Porsche, Müller led the Audi and Lamborghini brands following a lengthy career at Audi. Müller, who is 62 years old, began at Audi in 1977. Market insiders say that Müller will be noticed as a rank-and-file friendly CEO whose monumental activity might be helped by leveraging Porsche’s influence on the brand overall.

“In the previous, Porsche has had a disproportionately favorable influence on the overall portfolio performance of the Volkswagen,” Jeff Thinnes, a former Mercedes Benz executive, told ABC News. “Expect to see the Porsche influence improve considerably throughout the highest echelons of the company.”

Michael Horn, CEO of Volkswagen of America, will remain, but he will now report to Prof. Dr. Winfried Vahland, previously the Chairman of the Board of Directors at Škoda, “who in this new part becomes a member of the Volkswagen brand Board of Management” responsible for North America (United States, Canada and Mexico), Volkswagen mentioned in a statement.

The Truth About Automobiles » Automobile Testimonials